Product Details:
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA; Revised edition (March 2009)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0195372751
ISBN-13: 978-0195372755
Product Dimensions:
9.3 x 6.2 x 1.4 inches
Shipping Weight: 1.8 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
Book Reviews Editorial The Baader-Meinhof group - later when the Red Army Faction (RAF) is known - was a violent urban guerrilla group, Germany terrorized in the 1970s and 80s, 47 people were killed and 93 robbed, among 162 hostages and 35 banks all in an attempt to bring the revolution in the Federal Republic of - fundamentals of electric circuits pdf rapidshare. History masterful Stefan Aust, presents the definitive record of the consolidated accounts, a complex history both accurate and colorful fundamentals of electric circuits pdf rapidshare. Many new information since the mass suicide of the leader of the organization in the 1980s emerged. Some members of the RAF was to testify in investigations of new and previously classified documents from the Stasi were since the fall of the Berlin Wall, published, and simultaneously contributing to a more complete picture of the RAF and the events surrounding her disappearance. Aust shows the entire history of the RAF, which was founded in 1970 to the outbreak in 1998, incorporating all new information. For example, there is more evidence that German intelligence on the Baader Meinhof and the RAF members imprisoned in Stammheim spied upon and they knew that terrorists planned a mass suicide, but did nothing to prevent. There are also new information on the role of the RAF lawyers (among them Otto Schily, who later served as Minister of the Interior in the cabinet of Gerhard Schroder), and the roles of different members of the RAF and the rivalry between them. The volume contains many photographs. Today, terrorism is never far from the minds of men. Baader-Meinhof offers a gripping account of one of the most brutal terrorists of the late twentieth century, in a fascinating look at what they did, why they did and how they were brought to justice. Questions for Stefan Aust Q: Since your background as a former editor of the friendship and specifically, Ulrike Meinhof, as was the original version of the book from the left side received when it first came out? Although you do not explicitly at the time, the book seems to demonstrate very conclusively that the death in prison of Stammheim really strange suicides, but there seems to be an article of faith among the left, Baader, Ensslin and Raspe were murdered. How does your book from the left side was received at the time? And it has changed with the new issue, especially now that you mention it clear that her death was suicide to do? A: If the first book published in 1985, many copies were purchased by members of the RAF who were in prison. Some of them have learned to read beyond the first generation of the group above all by the book. But that does not stop them - or their supporters - as very critical. On a talk show, said Hans Christian Strobele, a former lawyer for the RAF and later Member of Parliament (Green Party), the Baader Meinhof and would turn over in her grave if she read the book ... After more than 20 years, I now feel that even people from the left to see the book as a work instead of a just and fair journalism. Today, its main argument is that the book has the prerogative of interpretation on the subject - which means the leadership of the RAF's views on terrorism. Q: There are many people who do not understand the leaders of the RAF, the devastation they caused to romanticize. Baader-Meinhof Complex, the film nominated for an Oscar, that you wrote last year, the glorification of terrorism has been indicted. What are your thoughts on this criticism? Is there any way to show the saga Baader-Meinhof, not to glorify or idealize accused of terrorism? A: When you write or support movies about groups like the RAF to their immorality. I want this group to represent as accurately as possible. Itwould be impossible for a book-reader or viewer to understand the film, why so many people followed them, when they represented simply as bandits and criminals. It was her charisma that made them sidangereux. One of the reasons why we showed the group of bomb attacks and assassinations in such detail that we explain what is really wanted is terrorism: terrorism and the killing of human beings - human beings - not inanimate character masks. The aim was to understand the audience why people of high moral standards turned into ruthless killers, such as hyper-morality turned into immorality. Q: Did you see here, from left terrorist movements roots in Europe or America again? One reason that the Baader-Meinhof group has been in the early '70s rise in part to the inefficiency of the police. It seems that in the current climate, especially since 9 / 11, it would be very difficult for a band of revolutionaries captured quickly for urban war as without. Do you agree? What kind of movement could succeed in the radical left? A: Any kind of terrorist activity is always part of a radical. A terrorist group can change if more radical movement of any kind - left, right, nationalist or religious. Organizations such as al-Qaida to operate within a worldwide movement of Islamic fundamentalism. Similarly, the RAF was a part of the radical Left in Germany, at least initially. And when this terrorist group is integrated in a great movement enough supporters for a longer period of work. Even the leftists - - called the police were members of the RAF in the first place, because normal people arrested. The accumulation of huge police and security authorities in Germany could not be as effective without the cooperation of the people. The only way for a radical leftist movement to success is to use the power to convince people rather than with violence of any kind. Q: The only hard concept for an American living in the 21st Century is the idea that members of the RAF, which is found to react by attacking the state and the state with massive retaliation, to understand that "It would be a large number of German people, then take up their cause would be . and the overthrow of the state, it just seems totally crazy, especially of the intelligent people realize how they could reach the point where it seemed reasonable A:.? I can only quote Ulrike Meinhof, who often said, "If stupidity As die die in intelligence? "which means" how stupid can capture the intelligence? "The first mistake of the RAF was not shown the truth, For. I had all the fight from the beginning of my research to realize that the Red Army Faction, a quasi-religious figure , but had a solid policy. To say that the German masses would overthrow the capitalist system is totally irrational. I can not believe they really thought it was an experiment with one's own Rather, they acted as a political or religious martyr to show that the state was so brutal, as they thought .. it - and others' - lives. Q: What was, as desVerstecken Ulrike Meinhof as a person before entering? Specifically, the reading of his essays in chronological order, it is by how much more hardened, desperate, and humorless, she was hit in later columns. She was so in his personal life? Did she have fun and socialize? Does it seem like it was an internal conflict? A: Ulrike was very impressive. She was well educated and could no longer its position in a very persuasive. At the same time, it was quite an intolerant person, the things they knew better than others thought ... However, loved the people, the liberal movement, andThey socialized a lot during his time in Hamburg and concreteness, which she wrote at this time about the poor, the people in sweatshops and prison. Ultimately, they could not live on in both worlds. When she went to Berlin, she became increasingly depressed. Finally, I think his involvement in the RAF was due to the many personal and psychological reasons. Read more
Tags: Baader-Meinhof The Inside Story of the R.A.F. (9780195372755) Stefan Aust, Anthea Bell , tutorials, pdf, ebook, torrent, downloads, rapidshare, filesonic, hotfile, megaupload, fileserve
